Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44588 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2002 19:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 44577 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 19:50:04 -0000 Date: 15 May 2002 19:50:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20020515195008.3894.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9038] - suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038 suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36 ------- Additional Comments From abatko@cs.mcgill.ca 2002-05-15 19:50 ------- To answer your question, I know that suexec only affects virtual hosts and user directories. In my case, I want suexec to work in user directories, so I enabled cgi explicitly with "Options ExecCGI". I'm not using virtual hosts; and I don't really understand the purpose of the directive SuexecUserGroup. Why specify a user and group for cgi programs to run as, when the point of suexec, from what i've read is to run cgi programs as their respective owners ? I hope my lack of understanding this point won't hinder you from investigating the problem. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org