Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-bugs-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 81641 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2002 17:00:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: "Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List" Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 81364 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2002 17:00:53 -0000 Date: 14 Apr 2002 17:00:55 -0000 Message-ID: <20020414170055.16676.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@httpd.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8037] - documentation of Script directive does not define arguments well enough X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8037 documentation of Script directive does not define arguments well enough slive@apache.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From slive@apache.org 2002-04-14 17:00 ------- I have improved the documentation to tell people that cgi-script is a URL-path. You are correct that this was not clear (although the example seems to make it obvious). As far as your problem with the error message, I'm not exactly sure what you mean. If you want that addressed, please file another report specifically addressing that issue. Thanks for using Apache. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org