httpd-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7252] - Should fopen() in this example really be ap_pfopen ()?
Date Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:56:33 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7252>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7252

Should fopen() in this example really be ap_pfopen ()?

jerenkrantz@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From jerenkrantz@apache.org  2002-03-19 18:56 -------
Yeah, it should be.  That fragment is sorely out-of-date.

Revision 1.20 of httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/misc/API.html has a
quick pass at trying to make it reflect 1.3's reality.  The website
now has the latest version.

Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


Mime
View raw message