Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C61E200BC1 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 46592160B13; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9192C160B03 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:08 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 88003 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2016 09:43:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87080 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2016 09:43:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 13AAFC09E4; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=beamartyr.net Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18R6cablyeB2; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.mirimar.net (mail1.mirimar.net [85.195.98.136]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9F4425F306; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.103] (Tonys-IGLD-240-13.inter.net.il [192.117.240.13] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.mirimar.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAG9gTcR017340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:42:32 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beamartyr.net; s=mail; t=1479289352; bh=/enT8Sa2fl415MQMxYCCaCVtv0DvOmPlzZfr3guHoSA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XW08ECOQTHNAqESQ/MwVUQX2DhZeTu0Ie2ros1erl7Wbf94W9Yocu6c6IKp6n9OQE o7cAUqz07tXT2mYjSuTg8VE0iQ+rTzStevgoAlD8MBg0s2fS3s58N7HX+mh/dsnV9u srmRi+uNgfR6ZjesyO2B1XEe9ktQOtRurMN7tA7U= Subject: Re: apreq release To: Andres Thomas Stivalet References: <86dca07b-40f1-475e-4c96-89e808fbdb03@beamartyr.net> Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@perl.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org From: Issac Goldstand Message-ID: <638ce189-64f3-8361-3898-eac2110d0c79@beamartyr.net> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:42:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:43:09 -0000 Given that the C was (finally) merged into httpd years ago, and given that there are no proposed code changes, I'd say that's not such a bad idea... I've become a bit rusty in Perl (and even with apreq) over the years, but IIRC, all of the Perl glue is in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/trunk/glue/perl/ I'll take a crack at seeing if I can fold it into mod_perl despite the rust. On 11/15/2016 2:45 PM, Andres Thomas Stivalet wrote: > Good news!! No idea why apreq hasn't just been merged into mod_perl > after all these years. > > A+++ > > On Nov 15, 2016 3:27 AM, "Issac Goldstand" > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with > Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an > updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the changes > to the test suite and immediately go to a release cycle. > > Does anyone want time to add anything else to libapreq-2.14 before I > start tarring and voting (in the next few days, I hope)? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@perl.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@perl.apache.org > >