Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781B0200BC1 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:56:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 76AE5160B13; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C06A3160B08 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:56:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 92253 invoked by uid 500); 16 Nov 2016 08:56:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91307 invoked by uid 99); 16 Nov 2016 08:56:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D83DC0650; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=beamartyr.net Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ro0zR83VqGzY; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.mirimar.net (mail2.mirimar.net [85.195.98.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3044F5F645; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.103] (Tonys-IGLD-240-13.inter.net.il [192.117.240.13] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail1.mirimar.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id uAG8uOiG003604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:56:26 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=beamartyr.net; s=mail; t=1479286587; bh=LSYK1X6STJdN2fJOkpM4LZFBF/NvZkAAc/RAgMZZ6yU=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5pExVJDpRDRf5AjkAH67lnzIfsZLKp6b6BCcjZjA9ScAScA+9Ra3GRCmFAN0bGs4o AZqlWZJSUqyCK1CYKI7DZUPNHRvK0QH0SldZ6otyiJcUokHvDHo1j1hzDiISnqzhqI NrObVSCEexmjOSVUE38ONdN7Hs8FSfiBozVaKnmQ= Subject: Re: apreq release To: Mark Hedges References: <86dca07b-40f1-475e-4c96-89e808fbdb03@beamartyr.net> Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@perl.apache.org From: Issac Goldstand Message-ID: <05acaab4-fff8-f9a9-29ab-a80e7a540042@beamartyr.net> Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:56:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 08:56:55 -0000 Honestly, I've no clue. The plan is just to add a few checks with mod_version (if available) to deal with the 2.2/2.4 config syntax changes, and the changes so far seem to only be in the test suite. I haven't hit any changes in libapreq itself yet. I don't have any connection with the Debian maintainers, but if someone on these lists does and has interest, they're welcome to update following the ANNOUNCE message post-release. On 11/15/2016 9:17 PM, Mark Hedges wrote: > Any chance this is what keeps me from running the Apache::Test tests for > Apache2::Controller under Apache 2.4? > > Will this be packaged and released to Debian Stretch before it goes > stable, or can you advise the package maintainers to update? > > Thanks. > Mark > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Issac Goldstand > wrote: > > Hi all, > > Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with > Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an > updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the changes > to the test suite and immediately go to a release cycle. > > Does anyone want time to add anything else to libapreq-2.14 before I > start tarring and voting (in the next few days, I hope)? > >