Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17857 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2009 19:49:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2009 19:49:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 20231 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 19:49:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 20162 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2009 19:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 18366 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2009 19:47:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:44:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Hedges To: Clinton Gormley cc: apreq-dev Subject: Re: libapreq 2.12 failing with apache 2.2.14 In-Reply-To: <1254903760.6024.3.camel@getafix.traveljury.com> Message-ID: References: <1254865321.16974.0.camel@getafix.traveljury.com> <1254903760.6024.3.camel@getafix.traveljury.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) X-Ray: Vision MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: clint@traveljury.com, apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hedges@scriptdolphin.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on li16-163.members.linode.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > If you were referring to 5.10*, I can't use that version > because of certain bugs that haven't been fixed - they > keep throwing errors in my app. Duh yeah that's what I meant. I know with 5.8.8 there were a lot of problems because of a bug in ExtUtils::ParseXS, there was a recent fix that was supposed to fix this, does it help to upgrade that and/or other core ExtUtils modules? Mark