Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49954 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2009 18:11:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jan 2009 18:11:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 6133 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 18:11:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6115 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2009 18:11:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 6106 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2009 18:11:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:11:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.190.49.133] (HELO web54403.mail.yahoo.com) (206.190.49.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:10:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 65790 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2009 18:10:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=aqTeYyDqAYcPGf+FuHBqHqYJ3TarcLXvrBzEvnpxLm+Zf9fvh71oH4g7jlgqoxURFCcmvOQTWva2ywOZBnBI68LCE0AnM1TJXKpvQOCT/x9RJNTHlJlOAektkbO+AksSskiRUI7173tvS3mqfxcGUmrYz7tGAaPyVhVfooc2JtA=; X-YMail-OSG: gCkcAiIVM1nRlGViZiH65pZx94IbEO6.fXjtP0l.P1VNJg3Kl97Cjp2558POftttyKTHLBnQGtMnnV67pRQVi2pGYFlQZViSlj61Q10cdbByljTfSVZwXOqdXpUZl5DaNu.HI1yoQblE3xpimYDNtnmDWrT_ASj01CRjTJ2ykEWVO7ix.CYKNZyRvxsBhbQS7ulY2NvJkpWFmUdD Received: from [65.12.220.185] by web54403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:10:31 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1155.45 YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 References: <20090110014205.9D08B23888EB@eris.apache.org> <4968C41D.5020904@beamartyr.net> <523404.49603.qm@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> <1231668644.28717.0.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <110386.24919.qm@web54405.mail.yahoo.com> <1231776564.28717.4.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <928814.8279.qm@web54404.mail.yahoo.com> <496B737E.9030500@beamartyr.net> <1231781517.28717.6.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:10:31 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Schaefer Subject: Re: svn commit: r733221 - in /httpd/apreq/branches/v2_10: include/apreq_version.h library/module_cgi.c library/parser.c module/apache2/handle.c To: Bojan Smojver , Issac Goldstand Cc: APREQ List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <925091.63611.qm@web54403.mail.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bojan Smojver > To: Issac Goldstand > Cc: Joe Schaefer ; APREQ List > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 12:31:57 PM > Subject: Re: svn commit: r733221 - in /httpd/apreq/branches/v2_10: include/apreq_version.h library/module_cgi.c library/parser.c module/apache2/handle.c > > On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:44 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: > > > Regardless of that, I'd like to merge in the enhanced-cgi stuff later in > > the week. So we can either do 2 consecutive releases or get 2.10 out > > the door now and re-vote on 2.11 in another week or so. > > We didn't have a release for a very long time, so one extra week isn't > going to make a lot of difference. People have been asking for enhanced > CGI stuff, so let's do that. Everyone OK with that approach? Fine with me. I'm no longer committing stuff to the v2_10 branch, so someone should probably nuke it.