Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of adam.prime@utoronto.ca
 designates 128.100.132.151 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <496CA373.90804@utoronto.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:21:39 -0500
From: Adam Prime <adam.prime@utoronto.ca>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
CC: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r734094 - /httpd/apreq/branches/1.x/RELEASE
References: <20090113103515.0D7BE2388882@eris.apache.org>
 <496C7DA0.1040006@beamartyr.net>
In-Reply-To: <496C7DA0.1040006@beamartyr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Issac Goldstand wrote:
> I'd like this to get good review, so posting here so even folks who
> aren't on the commit mailing-list can comment.
> 
> Please take a look at the 1.x/RELEASE file and comment.
> 
> Thanks,
>   Issac
> 

This revision still mentions crosspointing to modperl@, is that still to 
be taken out?

Given the problems with md5, should that hashing algorithm still be 
used?  I imagine that it's problems, coupled with the fact that the file 
has to actually untar too would probably mitigate md5's problems 
significantly, but i still thought i'd mention it.

Just being a bystander on this list, i don't know how you tell the 
difference between who's a committer and who's on the PMC.  I imagine 
this isn't a problem for people that have been one or the other for a 
while, but it wouldn't hurt to point to a list of PMC members or something.

Section 8 also confuses me a bit because it says that

   if there is a "majority consensus" (three +1 and more +1s
   than -1s) among the httpd PMC members, the RM may proceed with the
   release.

But then goes on to say that

   If any -1s are received, the release is rejected.

So which is it?  (i presume the last one)

Adam