Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96338 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2009 05:03:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2009 05:03:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 51017 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 03:17:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50997 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 03:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50986 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2009 03:17:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:17:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:17:02 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CE48C1F8 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:16:40 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11 From: Bojan Smojver To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1232656366.22059.5.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> References: <49759DEE.6020908@beamartyr.net> <1232517137.2186.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <4978879C.1070601@beamartyr.net> <1232656366.22059.5.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:16:40 +1100 Message-Id: <1232680600.28125.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 (2.24.3-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 07:32 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 16:50 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote: > > I don't get any fails by me... Can you try make test-ing apreq2-2.08 > > and see if you get the same fails so we know if it's a regression? > > Will do. Same in 2.08: ---------------------- t/big_request....ok t/cgi............ok t/cookie.........ok t/request........34/36 # Failed test 34 in t/request.t at line 93 fail #2 # Failed test 36 in t/request.t at line 118 fail #2 t/request........ Failed 2/36 subtests ---------------------- Not a regression. -- Bojan