Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com
 designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r733221 - in /httpd/apreq/branches/v2_10:
 include/apreq_version.h library/module_cgi.c library/parser.c
 module/apache2/handle.c
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@rexursive.com>
To: Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
Cc: Joe Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>,
 APREQ List <apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <496B737E.9030500@beamartyr.net>
References: <20090110014205.9D08B23888EB@eris.apache.org>
	 <4968C41D.5020904@beamartyr.net> <523404.49603.qm@web54406.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <1231668644.28717.0.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
	 <110386.24919.qm@web54405.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <1231776564.28717.4.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
	 <928814.8279.qm@web54404.mail.yahoo.com>  <496B737E.9030500@beamartyr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:31:57 +1100
Message-Id: <1231781517.28717.6.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:44 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
  
> Regardless of that, I'd like to merge in the enhanced-cgi stuff later in
> the week.  So we can either do 2 consecutive releases or get 2.10 out
> the door now and re-vote on 2.11 in another week or so.

We didn't have a release for a very long time, so one extra week isn't
going to make a lot of difference. People have been asking for enhanced
CGI stuff, so let's do that. Everyone OK with that approach?

-- 
Bojan