httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net>
Subject Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
Date Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:50:04 GMT
I don't get any fails by me...  Can you try make test-ing apreq2-2.08
and see if you get the same fails so we know if it's a regression?

  Issac

Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:48 +0200, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> 
>> a try and report comments/problems/etc. to the apreq-dev list
>> at apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org.
> 
> t/big_request....ok     
> t/cgi............ok     
> t/cookie.........ok   
> t/request........31/36 # Failed test 34 in t/request.t at line 93 fail
> #2
> t/request........36/36 # Failed test 36 in t/request.t at line 118 fail
> #2
> t/request........ Failed 2/36 subtests 
> t/upload.........ok 
> 
> Are these regressions or did we have these before? I'm having a feeling
> that's the same SSL stuff we've seen before.
> 


Mime
View raw message