httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:53:34 GMT




----- Original Message ----
> From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@rexursive.com>
> To: Philip M. Gollucci <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
> Cc: Torsten Foertsch <torsten.foertsch@gmx.net>; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org; Issac
Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:15:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.11
> 
> On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 14:53 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> 
> > I built from SVN.... or do you mean you'll add a patch to the rpm
> > after release ?
> 
> I thought you were referring to current RPM build/install there.
> 
> If there is a problem with build/install on CentOS from source and we
> know how to fix it, we should do it before we push the release out the
> door. Version numbers are cheap.

That is bunk.  We shoul NEVER try to support svn builds for releases,
because that makes us dependent on whatever autocruft is on CentOS.
It also doesn't help diddly squat when testing a potential candidate
for release, since those are bundled by the RM's autotools.

Please use the ACTUAL tarball when filing bug reports against a release.
Thanks!


      

Mime
View raw message