httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r733221 - in /httpd/apreq/branches/v2_10: include/apreq_version.h library/module_cgi.c library/parser.c module/apache2/handle.c
Date Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:09:23 GMT
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 06:32 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Are you planning to pursue 2.10 as RM or
> should we be moving on to 2.11?  The only outstanding issue I am aware
> of is pgollucci's claim that the perl modules aren't linking correctly
> to libapreq2 on Solaris.  While that would be nice to fix, I don't consider
> it a showstopper either.

I'm kinda waiting for the outcome of that discussion on the list before
we go ahead. From what I can see, current decision is to have 2.11
released, right? If so, let's roll that (I'm not attached to version
numbers in any way).

-- 
Bojan


Mime
View raw message