httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollu...@p6m7g8.com>
Subject Re: Should we release 2.10?
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:45:25 GMT
Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 10:44 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> Is there anything that needs to be addressed still before we roll this?
>> It's been a long time since the last stable release, I think we should
>> go ahead and get something out the door...
> 
> Just another ping on this.
> 
> There was talk of merging new features before the release and of people
> accessing apreq via Perl seeing segfaults. Anyone has an opinion on
> this?
> 
> PS. These are not things that I use.
> 
did you see the dev@perl.a.o post ?

I'd like to pick this up again.

_STRONG_ +1 to release 1.34 and 2.10

If you want to volunteer RM for one of them, I'll take the other.

I've got some time between now and thanks giving.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc.  http://p6m7g8.net
Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc.  http://ridecharge.com
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70  3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C

Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.

Mime
View raw message