Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46BACD9F.3080204@beamartyr.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:17:35 +0300
From: Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
CC: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org, modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.09-RC2
References: <4552DC38.2030609@p6m7g8.com>
 <1186450079.14008.2.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708070011430.845@vegeta.p6m7g8.net>
 <7F6FED92-C261-4809-91D7-887107096729@2xlp.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708081414260.28513@vegeta.p6m7g8.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708081414260.28513@vegeta.p6m7g8.net>
OpenPGP: url=http://www.beamartyr.net/pubkey.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Phillip,
  If it helps you move along better and have more time to review both 1
& 2, I'll voulenteer to pick up RMing 2.09 in addition to 1.34 so we can
get them both out the door.  Let me know.

  Issac

Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>>> Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since RC2
>> actually, i'd like to see an RC3-- there was an issue I kept
>> complaining about  that Joe was going to solve thanks to some testing
>> by dektidty@asianet.co.th -- reference the posting on 2007.05.25
> The RC3 was what I meant.
>
>> what are you doing there, if you don't mind me asking... i noticed
>> that they were hiring ruby people a while back.  i feared we lost you.
> The only and only System Admin (FreeBSD + ruby/rails) and worthless
> 'windows business' network.
>
> The fun comes soon when we move into Equinix.
>
>