httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Issac Goldstand <mar...@beamartyr.net>
Subject Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.09-RC2
Date Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:37:31 GMT


Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Issac Goldstand wrote:
>
>> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>>> Issac Goldstand wrote:
>>>> Following up on the FAIL report for win32:
>>
>>> Which CGI tests fail ?
>>
>> Erm, my win32 build computer fizzled a bit last night, but I'll try to
>> remember to post this on Sunday.  I've already seen the same tests
>> failing on a separate PC with a separate build environment (at work -
>> yesterday's build were on my home office PC); I saw it when I was
>> originally writing the interactive-cgi module (but never found time to
>> chase them down)
>>
>>>
>>>> The new Apache-Test-1.29-RC2 runs the test suite for 2.08 just fine
>>>> (against mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2).  However, here the test suite can't load
>>>> mod_perl (also mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2) into the server properly:
>>> The dection of mod_perl has changed 0 between 1.27->1.29 much less
>>> 1.29-rc1 and 1.29-rc2
>>>
>>>> CGI passes most tests (it fails 7; libapreq-2.08 also fails the same
>>>> ones lately.  That's a separate issue for a separate thread, though),
>>>> it's just the mod_perl ones that seem to fail.
>>> Didn't you just contradict yourself ?  I'm probably reading that wrong
>>>
>>
>> I don't think so - the CGI (t/apreq/cgi.t) test runs as a normal CGI, so
>> IIRC doesn't go through mod_perl...
>
> That's true, but it needs mod_perl, for some APR::* modules.
Not quite; it needs the perl glue (eg, the XS extensions linked against 
APR/Apache)
It doesn't need Apache running mod_perl.so
> Can you try installing the latest mod_perl-2.0.3-rc2 that
> Philip posted to see if that helps?
>
That's what I was using.
>>>> Deeper probing (t/conf/httpd.conf) shows that:
>>>> <IfModule !mod_perl.c>
>>>>     #unable to locate mod_perl.so (could be a static build)
>>>> </IfModule>
>>> Yes that would be the problem. (does Apache-Test have the correct path
>>> to apxs and is it actually functional?)
>>>
>>
>> I believe so; the same Apache-Test detects the same mod_perl just fine
>> on the 2.08 tarball - it's really quite odd...  Sunday I'll see if I can
>> reproduce this at work.
>
> Does the installed Apache::TestConfigData point to the
> correct httpd.exe?
>
Not sure - trying to replicate this at work now - we'll see what happens.

  Issac

Mime
View raw message