Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42230 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2006 10:16:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2006 10:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 83610 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2006 10:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83418 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2006 10:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 83306 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2006 10:16:37 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 03:16:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 03:16:33 -0700 Received: from [172.27.0.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [172.27.0.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DCD1AFCBF; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:55:10 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC5 From: Bojan Smojver To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <44D6C437.9030502@p6m7g8.com> References: <44D6A989.8070402@p6m7g8.com> <1154924290.2606.16.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <44D6C437.9030502@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:55:09 +1000 Message-Id: <1154944509.2606.39.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.4 (2.7.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 21:40 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Can you clue me in on this Fedora stuff and pardon my cluelessness. I'm not really an FE expert, but I'll give it a go :-) > Do you test build it first, or just submit it to that service and it does everything ? Normally, I'll run build locally to make sure everything is OK (this is optional, of course). Then, I'll build using the FE build system (this happens on i386, PPC and x86_64). This enables everyone that is subscribed to FE Development to get the new package for testing in the next few days. > Or do you test build it afterwards ? The idea is that if there are FC/FE users using libapreq2 out there, they will file bug reports and let me know if the package is broken. Sometimes I'm the guy that hits problems (e.g. -fno-strict-aliasing). > And what does it mean exactly if the service says "good" When the service says "good", it means "I can build the thing on my build platforms". PS. If you question is "does the build run 'make test'", the answer is no. -- Bojan