httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollu...@p6m7g8.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC5
Date Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:01:48 GMT
Thats was exactly what I wanted.  Thanks.

Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 21:40 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> 
>> Can you clue me in on this Fedora stuff and pardon my cluelessness.
> 
> I'm not really an FE expert, but I'll give it a go :-)
> 
>> Do you test build it first, or just submit it to that service and it does everything
?
> 
> Normally, I'll run build locally to make sure everything is OK (this is
> optional, of course). Then, I'll build using the FE build system (this
> happens on i386, PPC and x86_64). This enables everyone that is
> subscribed to FE Development to get the new package for testing in the
> next few days.
> 
>> Or do you test build it afterwards ?
> 
> The idea is that if there are FC/FE users using libapreq2 out there,
> they will file bug reports and let me know if the package is broken.
> Sometimes I'm the guy that hits problems (e.g. -fno-strict-aliasing).
> 
>> And what does it mean exactly if the service says "good"
> 
> When the service says "good", it means "I can build the thing on my
> build platforms".
> 
> PS. If you question is "does the build run 'make test'", the answer is
> no.
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F  6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F

"In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."

Mime
View raw message