httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [RT] what's the roadmap?
Date Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:51:34 GMT
Eli Marmor wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> First, congrats and thanks for 2-2.07.
> 
> Everything sounds great (well, maybe except for the words "that may
> take some time doing" ;-)
> 
> My question: currently, there is one big libapreq2-2.07.tar.gz; Why
> don't we split it into two files, one for the "C glue", a candidate for
> the integration into httpd (or apr/apr-util?), and the second, Perl
> glue, depnding on the former, a candidate for integration into
> mod_perl/CPAN?

++1 and I'd be happy to help review anyone's efforts in this direction.

> I believe that axing the Perl from the base library may clean the
> fears of the httpders, while having the C in httpd/apr and having only
> Perl in the Perl-glue (that depends on a standard stuff which was
> integrated into httpd/apr) may help the mod_perl guys to integrate it.

You know, I know, Joe knows apreq's c core isn't all that perl centric,
but I don't think the dev@httpd community is really aware of this fact.
This is a good suggestion.

Bill

Mime
View raw message