httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Sabol" <sa...@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject Re: towards a 2.07 release
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:51:41 GMT
> So I don't know how to proceed at this point. We could either
>
> 1) leave things as-is, which allows the cpan client to sift through the
> generated Makefile in order to pursue unsatisfied prereqs,
>
> or
>
> 2) change back the "warn" calls to "die", which will confuse the cpan
> client, but will allow human users to figure out exactly what needs to
> be done in order for the build to continue.
>
> Opinions?

It seems to me that both are desirable under different circumstances. Does it
make sense to add an option to configure.pl ("--die-if-prereqs-fail"?) which
controls this?

Mime
View raw message