httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ville Skyttä <vsky...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: libapreq2 2.06 submitted to Freshmeat
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2005 09:43:07 GMT
Oops, accudentally sent to Bojan in PM only, sorry about that!  Here's
the list copy:

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 12:08 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 08:51 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Quoting VilleSkyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>:
> > 
> > > FYI, libapreq2 2.06 RPMS for Fedora Core 4 (and soon development) are
> > > available from Fedora Extras, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras
> > 
> > Any chance you could include *.tag files in the docs directory of
> > libapreq2-devel package?
> 
> Sure, no problem.  But a few questions, I'm not that intimately familiar
> with the docs system:
> 
> Is it optimal to have apr.tag and apu.tag in libapreq2-devel, or would
> they be better placed in apr-devel and apr-util-devel, where the
> corresponding docs are, too?
> 
> The *.tag files contain <path>s to /home/joe/src/apache/... which
> obviously isn't a valid path for others than Joe.  Should I change that
> to something else?  If yes, should it point to the dir containing the
> referenced headers (/usr/include/...), or their HTML docs
> (/usr/share/doc/...)?
> 
> I opted for the docs dir in the above and rolled test packages, it'd be
> great if you could check them out before I commit:
> http://cachalot.mine.nu/tmp/
> 
> On a related note, using bugzilla.redhat.com (product "Fedora Extras",
> component libapreq2) for bug reports and RFE's is the preferred issue
> report channel for this package, feedback there is more likely to be
> noticed and less likely to fall through the cracks.


Mime
View raw message