Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99274 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 08:12:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 08:12:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 61961 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 08:12:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61928 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2005 08:12:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61899 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2005 08:12:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from duempel.org (HELO swift.roonstrasse.net) (81.209.165.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:12:30 -0800 Received: (qmail 2163 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Jan 2005 08:10:52 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:10:52 +0100 From: Max Kellermann To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [multi-env] {.name = NULL } Message-ID: <20050126081052.GA2127@roonstrasse.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 2005/01/26 06:28, Randy Kobes wrote: > On Win32, in the multi-env branch, the presence of {.name = NULL} > confuses VC++. Previously just {NULL} was used. I'm not sure of the > differences, but this patch: that was a warning fix with C99 syntax I forgot to remove. if this breaks VC++, then let's revert it.