httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>
Subject Re: [PATCH] first snapshot of my "let's kill void*env" patch
Date Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:42:43 GMT
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Schaefer wrote:

> Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I mentioned last week that I'm not satisfied with the current apreq2
> > API, it has a number of flaws:
> >
> > - despite the vtable-like apreq_env_t struct, there can only be one
> >   env module within a process
>
> Correct.  What we are trying to do with apreq_env is to
> allow libapreq2 (and the perl glue) to work in different
> programming environments (CGI, Apache2.0, etc.).  We
> weren't really trying to do what you want it to do, but
> maybe we should be.

I like the current capabilities of being able to work under
different environments (CGI, Apache2/mod_perl2 ... - it
doesn't even have to be Apache in principle). I didn't quite
follow all the intricacies, though - do you, Joe, see a
basic problem with the current approach that Max is
addressing?

-- 
best regards,
randy

Mime
View raw message