Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66976 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 23:30:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 23:30:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 91619 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 23:30:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91578 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 23:30:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91564 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2004 23:30:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [218.214.6.102] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (218.214.6.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:30:27 -0700 Received: from meowth.rexursive.com (meowth.rexursive.com [172.27.0.10]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36231E802; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:30:24 +1000 (EST) Received: from [172.27.0.20] (beast.rexursive.com [172.27.0.20]) by meowth.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514ADEFC74; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:30:24 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: plans for 2.04-dev From: Bojan Smojver To: Joe Schaefer Cc: APREQ List In-Reply-To: <87wu0da6l4.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> References: <87wu0da6l4.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Rexursive Message-Id: <1092094223.2519.9.camel@beast.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 09:30:23 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 02:32, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Any other ideas about what we want to include in > 2.04-dev? (Remember our ultimate goal is to > release a stable 2.05 around November's ApacheCON). Thanks for this piece of info. At present, the CVS fails to build as an RPM, I'm guessing due to mod_perl issues (I'm not a Perl guy, so you'll have to excuse my ignorance). -- Bojan