Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81525 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2004 02:04:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jul 2004 02:04:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 38909 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2004 02:04:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38855 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2004 02:04:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38839 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2004 02:04:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [195.154.174.52] (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:04:50 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6B41E1AD2; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 04:04:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40E8B72D.3050402@stason.org> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 19:04:29 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040617 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Schaefer Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Apache::Request References: <40E85667.4030401__31894.6476829753$1088968323$gmane$org@stason.org> <871xjrw9cn.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> In-Reply-To: <871xjrw9cn.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Schaefer wrote: > Stas Bekman writes: > > [...] > > >>why not require a higher ExtUtils::MakeMaker? It's easily >>upgradable from CPAN, not requiring a perl upgrade. > > > +1 (no patch from me though). But where should the requirement come from. I think you need it in the apreq's Makefile.PL, no? mod_perl itself has no such requirement and we won't create it. Or should it go into ModPerl::MM? In which case it can only be done dynamically from ModPerl::MM::WriteMakefile, which won't tell CPAN/CPANPLUS about the prerequisites in time. So may be both apreq's Makefile.PL and dynamically at ModPerl::MM::WriteMakefile is the best fit? Which version again do we need to require? -- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com