Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63601 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 18:30:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 18:30:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 55499 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2004 18:30:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55466 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2004 18:30:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 55444 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2004 18:30:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [128.183.17.62] (HELO gamma.gsfc.nasa.gov) (128.183.17.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:29:59 -0700 Received: from alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.16.213]) by gamma.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6MITqQ8031784 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:29:52 -0400 Received: from alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6MITqgh002308 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:29:52 -0400 Received: (from sabol@localhost) by alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i6MITqag002304; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:29:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:29:52 -0400 Message-Id: <200407221829.i6MITqag002304@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> From: "Edward J. Sabol" To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org In-reply-to: <87hds0ug9g.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> (message from Joe Schaefer on 22 Jul 2004 13:02:35 -0400) Subject: Re: rename Apache::Cookie::Jar Apache::Jar References: <87hds0ug9g.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > IMO brevity should carry the day, but we first need to agree before > asking permission to take the Apache::Jar namespace. > > Thoughts? Not that I have any say in the matter, but Apache::Cookie::Jar has a certain aesthetic quality to its naming that Apache::Jar completely and utterly lacks. Coolness beats brevity in my book.