httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Randy Kobes <>
Subject Re: Trying to test current apreq2 CVS
Date Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:04:19 GMT
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[ .. ]
> Ok, I've committed a few modifications to the test suite
> that show a few problems with our fh() implementation.
> This is the reason I've been reluctant to downplay bucket
> brigades, since they are a better solution than
> filehandles are (file buckets don't buffer file IO, and
> they always perform a seek before every file-read
> operation).  Unless APR::PerlIO could be made to behave
> similarly, IMO maybe we're better off implementing fh() in
> straight perl, by just opening $upload->tempname() (Randy,
> does Win32 even let you do that)?

I'm not sure Win32 can do that - it probably can, as I don't
think there's a reason in principle why not. Unfortunately,
the current $upload->tempname() needs something extra on
Win32 (the current tempname tests fail in glue/perl) - I'm
currently looking at that.

best regards,

View raw message