httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: new apreq2 snapshot
Date Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:16:07 GMT
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> 
>> "Edward J. Sabol" <sabol@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>> Unsurprisingly, it failed to build, but, for some reason, the mod_perl
>>> version test in build/version_check.pl didn't do its job. It never
>>> informed me that my mod_perl version was insufficient.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please see if this patch fixes the prereq test:
>>
>> Index: build/version_check.pl
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq-2/build/version_check.pl,v
>> retrieving revision 1.16
>> diff -u -r1.16 version_check.pl
>> --- build/version_check.pl      5 Jul 2004 05:22:17 -0000       1.16
>> +++ build/version_check.pl      14 Jul 2004 18:53:46 -0000
>> @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@
>>           "Apache::Test" => { version => "1.04",    test => 
>> \&a_t_version,
>>                               comment => "Win32 requires version 
>> 1.06"    },
>>    "ExtUtils::XSBuilder" => { version => "0.23",    test => 
>> \&xsb_version },
>> -              mod_perl  => { version => "1.99_15", test => 
>> \&mp2_version },
>> +                 # mp2 does not contain "_" in its reported version 
>> number
> 
> 
> it's not mp, it's how perl converts x.xx_xx versions

doh! please ignore me.


-- 
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Mime
View raw message