Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26711 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2004 05:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jun 2004 05:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 50179 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2004 05:24:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50053 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2004 05:24:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 49907 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2004 05:24:49 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [218.214.6.102] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (218.214.6.102) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:24:48 -0700 Received: from meowth.rexursive.com (meowth.rexursive.com [172.27.0.10]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7349B1E802; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:22:26 +1000 (EST) Received: from [172.27.0.21] (furby.rexursive.com [172.27.0.21]) by meowth.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0FBEFC0A; Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:22:42 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: libapreq2-2.04-dev snapshot + html docs From: Bojan Smojver To: Joe Schaefer Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <87r7s3ua81.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> References: <87oencvfyu.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> <1088126599.40db7e87085be@imp.rexursive.com> <874qp0uxaz.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> <1088142691.40dbbd6391145@imp.rexursive.com> <87r7s3ua81.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1088227753.3210.4.camel@furby.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:29:14 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 21:51, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Of course the best solution would be for apr to generate > the tagfile itself. I just checked the APR CVS and the doxygen.conf file still doesn't generate the tagfile. I'll be a pest and propose a patch for both APR and APR-Util to that effect. We'll see what comes out of it. I would be far easier to handle the whole thing if each software came with its own tag file... Ah well, life's not perfect. Thanks for distributing apr.tag and apu.tag with libapreq2. It is a great help. -- Bojan