Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76851 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 18:04:41 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 18:04:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 89252 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2004 18:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89235 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2004 18:04:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 89220 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2004 18:04:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2004 18:04:33 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7IAe-0008B9-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:04:36 +0100 Received: from adsl-34-76-41.mia.bellsouth.net ([67.34.76.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:04:36 +0100 Received: from joe+gmane by adsl-34-76-41.mia.bellsouth.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 19:04:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org From: Joe Schaefer Subject: Re: Building on Red Hat 9 Date: 27 Mar 2004 13:04:34 -0500 Lines: 30 Message-ID: <87hdwacgjx.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> References: <89A627EE-7E7F-11D8-B366-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <40634DBC.5090200@stason.org> <3B22E255-7EA8-11D8-B366-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <40636CB7.7010508@stason.org> <9A4C1DD4-7EB6-11D8-B366-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <406371DA.5060001@stason.org> <65A2757A-7EB8-11D8-B366-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <40637348.7030503@stason.org> <406378AB.7070009@stason.org> <40637E3A.7040907@stason.org> <40638D23.7020201@stason.org> <40639706.2010507@stason.org> <04B6C9BF-7ECF-11D8-B366-000A95972D84@kineticode.com> <87r7vecnqr.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-34-76-41.mia.bellsouth.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Wheeler writes: > On Mar 27, 2004, at 7:29 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > +1. My only objection to Stas' patch has been that, until now, > > noone had confirmed that it worked on OS/X. Since we now know > > that this patch does, could you also please correct the > > INSTALL.MacOSX file? Or can we just chuck it entirely now? > > Does it need updating? We still have to compile the C libs first and > then the Perl module, AFAIK. But the document says you must INSTALL the C libs first, which I no longer believe is true once the patch is applied. So is all the stuff in INSTALL.MacOSX which is related to that (BUILD.sh, ./configure, etc.) still actually necessary? If you're not sure how to address my question, the simplest way to find out is by removing the installed shared libs for libapreq in /usr/local), and see if you can do the normal perl build/test/install (i.e. same as you would on RH-9). If that doesn't work, then we probably need to keep INSTALL.MacOSX; but if it does work, I think we can throw that file away now. Anyways, I'll defer the decision to you, since between the two of us you're the one with actual OS/X experience. I'm just playing blind guessing games :-). -- Joe Schaefer