Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33486 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 16:12:22 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 16:12:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 68247 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2004 16:12:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68224 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2004 16:12:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 68207 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 16:12:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.magnifire.com) (212.150.5.72) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 16:12:18 -0000 Received: by webmail.magnifire.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 177051337BE; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:59:40 +0200 (IST) From: "Nir Shahaf" To: "apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org" Subject: Re: query string parser X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.25 X-IPAddress: 212.150.5.90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <20040126155940.177051337BE@webmail.magnifire.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:59:40 +0200 (IST) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I think that the situation where only one module can get the return code is better than the situation where none of the modules can, isn't it? > One big problem with this is that apreq_request() only parses the > query string once per-request. If some other module calls > apreq_request() before yours does, the return status will only be > available to them. > > In other words, to do what you're asking for, I think we'd need to > store the return value of apreq_parse_query_string() somewhere. > > > -- > Joe Schaefer > >