httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Wheeler <da...@kineticode.com>
Subject Re: MM Patch
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:43:46 GMT
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 10:04  PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:

> I hope not, since this problem was the main reason for 1.3.
> I applied Michael Schwern's patch instead of Stas' since I was
> concerned that Stas' patch would break picky platforms like OSX,
> whereas Michael's patch shouldn't have.

Hrm. What was Michael's patch? I was installing on RedHat 9, not OS X.

> OTOH empirical evidence speaks much louder than idle speculation.
> If you're willing to speak on the veracity of Stas' patch for
> OSX for 5.8.*, I have no objections to seeing it applied to cvs.
> Platform details would come in handy, since we've had trouble
> reproducing these build bugs in the past (especially if you have
> some libapreq.so's floating around from old "configure" installs-
> running "ldd" on the failing Request.so's might help us figure out
> which libraries are being linked in).

I'll take a look at this today.

David

-- 
David Wheeler                                     AIM: dwTheory
david@kineticode.com                              ICQ: 15726394
http://www.kineticode.com/                     Yahoo!: dew7e
                                                Jabber: Theory@jabber.org
Kineticode. Setting knowledge in motion.[sm]


Mime
View raw message