Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41802 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2003 21:54:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 41764 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2003 21:54:02 -0000 Received: from erato.logilune.com (HELO mail.logilune.com) (195.154.174.52) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2003 21:54:02 -0000 Received: from stason.org (localhost.logilune.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.logilune.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C91D799B5; Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:51:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3F4A74A9.9060909@stason.org> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:42:17 -0700 From: Stas Bekman Organization: Hope, Humanized User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030630 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, he, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Schaefer Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org, kold@kold.homelinux.com Subject: Re: [Mason] Can't locate object method "new" via package "Apache::Request" References: <1061775768.5818.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1061815693.2628.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3F4A43C6.8080908@stason.org> <1061834136.2616.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3F4A593A.2030504@stason.org> <1061838774.2628.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3F4A63BA.9080602@stason.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [please don't lose K Old from the CC, I'm not sure he is on this list] Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>>That probably means that my patches weren't applied. K Old, see >>>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apreq-dev&m=105965131008577&w=2 >>>> >>>>Does it solve the problem for you? >>> >>>Stas, >>>That did it! And to answer your question, no it doesn't look like >>>your changes were committed. >> >>Joe, Steve, so what was the outcome of the MM patching? I thought >>Steve has supplied a better patch, but it looks like the problem is >>still there. > > > I have no problem with current cvs on linux, using either 5.8.0 (old MM) > or 5.8.1-RC4 (new MM). It works for me too: K Old, can you test with the latest MakeMaker? http://search.cpan.org/author/MSCHWERN/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.16/ We may need to require this version of MM. >>Should my patch go in? > > I'm still very much against it, but I could be persuaded if > a MacOSX user says it works there. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com