Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50042 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2003 16:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 50029 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2003 16:48:05 -0000 Received: from dsl092-190-153.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO mercury.kineticode.com) (66.92.190.153) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2003 16:48:05 -0000 Received: from wheeler.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.kineticode.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h7EGm53G001089; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:48:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:48:03 -0700 Subject: Re: libapreq failures with 1.2 and Mac OS X Server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552) Cc: Chris Nandor , apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org To: Stas Bekman From: David Wheeler In-Reply-To: <3F3B050A.9020704@stason.org> Message-Id: <129F86E4-CE77-11D7-853F-0003931A964A@wheeler.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 08:42 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: > so can i go ahead and commit it or do you want to wait for an answer > from httpd-dev? I didn't post to httpd-dev, since I compiled Apache fine without it when I didn't compile mod_perl. > btw, we still need a note in INSTALL.MacOSX in the httpd-apreq distro. Why? Since apreq 1.1, apreq no longer needs to be statically compiled into Apache on Mac OS X. So there shouldn't be any instructions for compiling Apache at all in that file. Regards, David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory david@kineticode.com ICQ: 15726394 http://www.kineticode.com/ Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: Theory@jabber.org Kineticode. Setting knowledge in motion.[sm]