Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14398 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2003 05:35:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14387 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2003 05:35:07 -0000 Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (142.132.1.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2003 05:35:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5C5KX702687; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:20:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:20:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Randy Kobes To: Joe Schaefer cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [apreq-2] xsbuilder on Win32 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Randy Kobes writes: > > [...] > > > +my $apreq_lib_flags = Apache::Build::WIN32 ? > > + qq{-L$base_dir/win32/libs -llibapreq -lmod_apreq} : > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > I hope you can eventually figure out how to drop this dependency. > mod_apreq shouldn't be a requirement for compiling (& use()ing) > Apache::Request. > > Anyways +1 on all patches so far, including this one. > You might consider adding a comment regarding "-lmod_apreq" > for Win32 in STATUS. I'll take a look at this, and also add a note - right now, without the -lmod_apreq, I get missing apreq_env* symbols when trying to build Apache::Cookie. But that might be because I'm not building libapreq correctly .... -- best regards, randy