Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65727 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2003 03:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 65713 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2003 03:22:45 -0000 Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (142.132.1.82) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2003 03:22:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h3I3Bkm21146; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:11:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:11:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Randy Kobes To: Stas Bekman cc: Joe Schaefer , apreq dev list Subject: Re: apreq-2 status update In-Reply-To: <3E9F46CD.2050104@stason.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Schaefer wrote: > > Stas Bekman writes: > > [...] > >>Is it just me or others don't get apreq2 cvs commit emails? I thought > >>it was on the same list as apreq1, no? > > I'm getting them on the (same) apreq-cvs list. They're also showing > > up in the list archive at > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apreq-cvs&r=1&b=200304&w=2 > > That's amazing, if they are getting posted to the same list and > I do get the posts for httpd-apreq changes but not for > httpd-apreq-2. Any ideas why? > > Do other people get httpd-apreq-2 cvs commit emails? I'm receiving them OK ... -- best regards, randy