httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <s...@stason.org>
Subject Re: [apreq-2 proposal] backporting apreq_tables to APR
Date Thu, 01 May 2003 00:38:05 GMT
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Stas Bekman <stas@stason.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>>Ask apr-dev and let's see what they have to say, before wasting any time at
>>all. Or do you think that if a patch is sent instead of an rfc it'll be more
>>instrumental in making the the decision in favor of this move?
> 
> 
> Making the necessary changes didn't take much time at all (apr patch below).

Wow, that was quick! Go ahead and send it to apr-dev then.

>>Assuming that they welcome this change and the next Apache version will include
>>it. This will mean that apreq will be available on with that version or
>>higher. Is that OK?
> 
> 
> Works for me- and means we can keep the perl API contained within
> the Apache::Request / Apache::Cookie namespace.

Sorry, I'm not following you on the last note regarding the perl API.

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


Mime
View raw message