httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject the new 2.0 cvs rep is available
Date Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:01:50 GMT
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Stas Bekman <> writes:
>> [...]
>>> We all agree that waiting for httpd people to give a grace is a 
>>> complete waste of time. I suggest that we ask Brian Behlendorf to 
>>> create the apreq-2.0 repository and start working there. It's 
>>> important for preserving the history of changes. I see no reason why 
>>> not to do it *now*. Having a repository doesn't mean having a 
>>> production version of the code.
>> Yes, agreed- that would be best.  Unfortunately, according to 
>> /home/cvs/README, the first step in creating a new cvs repository is:
>>   (a) Get permission from your PMC. The PMC must approve the addition
>>   of any repository and should be contacted through the normal means.
>> That puts us back at square one, since (I think) our PMC is httpd.  I 
>> haven't yet lowered my self-esteem enough to now beg them for a new 
>> repository to begin our work. 
>> If there's a way to make things happen within our existing repository, 
>> that'd be a lot less painful for me to endure.  At least then, it's 
>> just technical obstacles that we will face.
> Let me run this through the asf members list. I have no clue what's the 
> status of the apreq project is. I thought it was a standalone project 
> with its own pmc. Hopefully this can be resolved quickly.
> I pretty much doubt anybody at httpd will be against creating a new 
> apreq-2.0 rep. or is it httpd-apreq-2.0?

Thanks to Brian Behlendorf (and silence from the httpd pmc ;) we now have 
a new shiny toy to play with: the httpd-apreq-2 cvs rep.

You want to to see Joe play with it.
(that's the same list, the httpd-apreq commits go to).

Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker     mod_perl Guide --->

View raw message