httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stas Bekman <>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-apreq Makefile.PL
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:26:29 GMT
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Stas Bekman <> writes:
>>Joe Schaefer wrote:
> [...]
>>>I agree, but it was simple enough to just move the modperl-1
>>>tests over.  I had some trouble getting the Apache::Tests to 
>>>run on my box, so I just copied over the tests from modperl-1.
>>>( Apache::Test kept reusing my modperl-2 test settings in 
>>>Apache::BuildConfig. I couldn't figure out how to get around this. )
>>You could have asked at the httpd-test mailing list. I believe in the 
>>long run it's better to rely on something that works with both
>>versions.  This gives us a better code reuse.
> Yes, in the non-short run.  However, right now my immediate 
> concern is to put together a 1.1 release candidate that 
>   1) has a functional test suite
>   2) includes support for OS X.
>   3) has no support for modperl-2, yet.
> I'd like to have that ready this weekend, so I can notify the
> modperl lists and macosx lists.  Once we get the green light
> from some users/testers, we can tag & roll a 1.1 release.
> After that, I'm all for moving efforts to including modperl-2 
> support, including replacing Apache::test with Apache::Test.

Sounds good to me.

>>Apache::Test comes with 2.0 and eventually it'll be distributed 
>>separately. So what we will do is simply make a dependancy rule in 
>>Makefile.PL and this will force the testers to install Apache::Test on
>>their machine. I guess we should do this right now.
> No, I'd prefer to *not* do that until *after* a 1.1 release.

Certainly. As meant that this dependency will be a goood idea when 
Apache::Test will be released
separately on CPAN.


Stas Bekman             JAm_pH      --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker      mod_perl Guide

View raw message