Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Joshua Moore-Oliva <chatgris@mediapow.com>
To: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Bit of confusion..
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 00:48:21 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <m3k7ospq3n.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3D167548.4040309@stason.org> <m3bsa1pf0w.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3bsa1pf0w.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200206240048.21652.chatgris@mediapow.com>

Not too sure what's going on here...  I'm about to upgrade to apache 2.0.=
39=20
(I'm on a devel machine, teh u/g wasn't too urgent from 2.0.36)

For the next semi official release of apreq, is this patch that was poste=
d to=20
the mailing list the thing to use now, or are we waiting for some inclusi=
on=20
into a soon to come version of apache?  Just wondering whether I should a=
pply=20
that new patch or wait..  currently I'm in no hurry to upgrade, I'm using=
 a=20
patched version that was posted by stas about a month ago and has the sam=
e=20
interfaces that are int he posted /h files.

Josh.