httpd-apreq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Schaefer <joe+apa...@sunstarsys.com>
Subject Re: Question
Date Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:38:39 GMT
Joshua Moore-Oliva <chatgris@mediapow.com> writes:

> Forgot to add this to my last email...  do the functions
> apreq_script_name( request_rec * r ) and apreq_script_path(
> request_rec * r ) work the same as their old apreq_request_script_name
> ( apreq_request_t * r_t ) apreq_request_script_path ( apreq_request_t
> * r_t ) counterparts?  Are there any changes to it expect that it
> takes a request rec instead of a apreq_request_t?

They should work the same as before.  The advantage of the argument
change is that you no longer need to create an apreq_request_t object 
in order to use them (IMO they mainly exist for making a cookie $Path 
from the current request_rec anyway).

Thanks for the timely feedback!
-- 
Joe Schaefer

Mime
View raw message