Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
To: Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net>
Subject: Re: 1.0 in CVS?
Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <m33d0xmg95.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
 <3C4EA7A6.8090803@beamartyr.net>
From: Joe Schaefer <joe@sunstarsys.com>
Date: 23 Jan 2002 07:25:05 -0500
In-Reply-To: Issac Goldstand's message of "Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:08:06 +0200"
Message-ID: <m3y9ipl0f2.fsf@mumonkan.sunstarsys.com>
Lines: 29
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Issac Goldstand <margol@beamartyr.net> writes:

> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> 
> >A few days ago I added a patch for 5.005thread support.
> >Are there any problems with the current CVS that would
> >prevent us from releasing it?
> >
> I haven't had any problems (yet), but I haven't aggressively tested 
> everything yet, either...  Is the documentation complete and up-to-date? 
>  I know I've run into that before a lot.
> 
>   Issac

The most recent patches were doc patches, mainly for Request.pm and 
Cookie.pm (and the ToDo). The INSTALL document is probably wrong wrt autoconf 
support- we don't currently include a working ./configure script.  I put 
some text in README to help C programmers roll their own libapreq.a, but
it's hardly an optimal solution.

To facilitate testing, I tarballed the current CVS.  You should be able
to grab it from

  http://www.apache.org/~joes/libapreq-1.0-rc1.tar.gz

Feedback, even if it's positive, is always appreciated :-)

-- 
Joe Schaefer