Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61204 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2002 06:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61193 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2002 06:48:08 -0000 To: "Issac Goldstand" Cc: Subject: Re: 5005thread patch (was Re: make failure for Apache::Request) References: <004d01c1980c$29905980$010aa8c0@deepthought> <005d01c1980f$3354a040$010aa8c0@deepthought> From: Joe Schaefer Date: 08 Jan 2002 01:48:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Issac Goldstand"'s message of "Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:39:17 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "Issac Goldstand" writes: > Is that to be understood as a motion to vote for the release the > recent CVS as 1.0? Or a last call for objections? modulo the 5005thread patch and some minor documentation patches to list the current outstanding bugs and things ToDo, yes. -- Joe Schaefer