Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61492 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2001 02:57:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 61481 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2001 02:57:28 -0000 To: Rodent of Unusual Size Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Licence.. References: <20011106215347.B5247@Lithium.MeepZor.Com> From: Joe Schaefer Date: 06 Nov 2001 21:58:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Rodent of Unusual Size's message of "Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:53:47 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rodent of Unusual Size writes: > Is it safe to assume that libapreq's licence should be updated > to the ASF 1.1 licence text? I think so. I just checked the LICENSE document, and it's not ASF 1.1. -- Joe Schaefer