Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-apreq-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 49710 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2001 02:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact apreq-dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 49696 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 02:22:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:22:11 -0700 From: Jim Winstead To: Randy Kobes Cc: apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: prepared 0.32 for release Message-ID: <20010409192211.A6505@trainedmonkey.com> Mail-Followup-To: Randy Kobes , apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org References: <20010403122713.B28346@trainedmonkey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: ; from randy@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:25:05PM -0500 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 06:25:05PM -0500, Randy Kobes wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Jim Winstead wrote: > > > so what's the verdict? my system is way too vanilla for this > > problem. obviously the define of PerlIO_importFILE is wrong (and > > i backed it out). is just undefining PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS going to be > > safe, or will there need to be a more esoteric check for activeperl? > > I wonder if this is a problem just with ActivePerl, or is > it more to do with something related to PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS? > I don't have access to a unix perl with PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS > defined though to check this out ... well, it looks like PerlIO_importFILE just simply may not be available when PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS is defined. i don't see how Apache::Upload::fh can be implemented without it, so we may just need to stub out that function when it is defined. (the same thing happens when sfio is being used, although at least then a dummy PerlIO_importFILE function is implemented that croaks. with a typo in the error message. :) jim