Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C373200C7E for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 00:15:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2ABB9160BC7; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 707A2160BA5 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 00:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 78923 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2017 22:15:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@htrace.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78907 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2017 22:15:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2017 22:15:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4B0781A0085 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.022 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YJ_DtXYW6Sv for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 67F625FCE8 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78681 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2017 22:15:04 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2017 22:15:04 +0000 Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.227]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 66C221A031E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 22:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3937A20AAF for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 18:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2017 18:15:02 -0400 X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1A09562704; Mon, 8 May 2017 18:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1494281702.100191.970053581.1E4498D8@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Colin McCabe To: dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc55fe1 In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 15:15:02 -0700 References: <1493927647.3183797.966122432.695B2553@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1493946855.4054706.966379336.42E4BBA7@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: 4.3.0 to maven archived-at: Mon, 08 May 2017 22:15:09 -0000 I think the C changes were just exposing additional APIs, so there should be no backwards compatibility implications. best, On Mon, May 8, 2017, at 12:48, Mike Drob wrote: > Had a chance to look at this in more detail. From the Java side we should > be safe to do 4.2.1. From the C side... I don't know what kind of > guarantees we offer there. Looks like addition of APIs, but I don't know > what C communities and users expect. > > Colin and Masatake - since you were involved in the change, can you > comment? > > Mike > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Raam Rosh-Hai wrote: > > > Doesn't seem like any api changes were made so I am for the sneaking in a > > minor version > >