Mailing-List: contact dev-help@htrace.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+qbEUNSsz2EYRPA_jREjKQAEmb9vkhJOzdiYQN3Nwa8K_6q9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgHFjYoPLkS5fVLxxNQd5mBm_+C0m5jt3RPtHmy0WFtEow@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+qbEUNSsz2EYRPA_jREjKQAEmb9vkhJOzdiYQN3Nwa8K_6q9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 14:47:09 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+sF+o1AV8FSYXygDddP3wq-EB7sZD4JmT=LrX++oYuGpw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What version should be the first apache htrace be? 4.0.0 or
 1.0.0?
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Colin McCabe <cmccabe@alumni.cmu.edu> wrote:
> I looked at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning
> and it doesn't say whether we need to start at 1.  Hmm.
>
> I think either way could work.  There is stuff from org.htrace up on
> Maven central, but since we're moving to org.apache.htrace, we won't
> conflict if we choose to go back to 1.0.0.  I don't really have any
> preference between 1.0.0 or 4.0.0.

Well said! Personally I have a slight preference towards 1.0.0 b/c
of the org.apache migration.

Thanks,
Roman.