Mailing-List: contact dev-help@htrace.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of andrew.purtell@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
From: Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: What version should be the first apache htrace be? 4.0.0 or
 1.0.0?
Message-Id: <26D0B901-12DA-4D83-9BB5-85CA7FF2B82B@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:38:14 -0800
References: 
 <CADcMMgHFjYoPLkS5fVLxxNQd5mBm_+C0m5jt3RPtHmy0WFtEow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+qbEUNSsz2EYRPA_jREjKQAEmb9vkhJOzdiYQN3Nwa8K_6q9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=Gu88mkOTsCHs6UFcyPM=y_YKwJJsp77h7gAN2OyGaJOVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANZa=Gu88mkOTsCHs6UFcyPM=y_YKwJJsp77h7gAN2OyGaJOVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org" <dev@htrace.incubator.apache.org>

What we did for Phoenix is make an initial ASF release that was the granted c=
ode with a package name search-and-replace and minor version increment. This=
 let us focus on all the Apache packaging and release concerns like NOTICE f=
ile wording, RAT compliance, etc. and provided an opportunity for existing u=
sers to migrate to an ASF artifact at low risk - just package renames. Then w=
e made a major version increment and put in some significant new features fo=
r that next release.=20


> On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> I think going backwards to 1.0 would be confusing for any existing users.
> Maybe make the -incubating releases pickup 3.1.x with the intention of the=

> first graduated release being 4.0.0. Could be seen as artificially
> inflating the version numbers, but I don't think that matters too much. I
> assume (prefer) we'll follow the guidelines of semantic versioning.
>=20
> -n
>=20
>> On Friday, December 5, 2014, Colin McCabe <cmccabe@alumni.cmu.edu> wrote:=

>>=20
>> I looked at
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-v=
ersioning
>> and it doesn't say whether we need to start at 1.  Hmm.
>>=20
>> I think either way could work.  There is stuff from org.htrace up on
>> Maven central, but since we're moving to org.apache.htrace, we won't
>> conflict if we choose to go back to 1.0.0.  I don't really have any
>> preference between 1.0.0 or 4.0.0.
>>=20
>> best,
>> Colin
>>=20
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>> org.htrace was at 3.0.4
>>>=20
>>> The next release could be 4.0.0.
>>>=20
>>> Or we could roll back and make it 1.0.0?
>>>=20
>>> Any opinions out there?
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>=20