htrace-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What version should be the first apache htrace be? 4.0.0 or 1.0.0?
Date Sat, 06 Dec 2014 05:46:40 GMT
Hi Folks,
+0 on keeping versioning going >3.1.X or 3.2
I'll get more involved as the weeks go on.
Have a great weekend folks
Lewis

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think going backwards to 1.0 would be confusing for any existing users.
> Maybe make the -incubating releases pickup 3.1.x with the intention of the
> first graduated release being 4.0.0. Could be seen as artificially
> inflating the version numbers, but I don't think that matters too much. I
> assume (prefer) we'll follow the guidelines of semantic versioning.
>
> -n
>
> On Friday, December 5, 2014, Colin McCabe <cmccabe@alumni.cmu.edu> wrote:
>
> > I looked at
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning
> > and it doesn't say whether we need to start at 1.  Hmm.
> >
> > I think either way could work.  There is stuff from org.htrace up on
> > Maven central, but since we're moving to org.apache.htrace, we won't
> > conflict if we choose to go back to 1.0.0.  I don't really have any
> > preference between 1.0.0 or 4.0.0.
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> > > org.htrace was at 3.0.4
> > >
> > > The next release could be 4.0.0.
> > >
> > > Or we could roll back and make it 1.0.0?
> > >
> > > Any opinions out there?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> >
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message