-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Gaderian team is pleased to announce the first official release of Gaderian, version 1.0. http://gaderian.ops4j.org/ Gaderian is a component assembly framework, providing service instantiation and configuration. Gaderian is a fork of the recently retired Apache HiveMind project and this release reflects the functionality as it was available in the v1.0 trunk revision for HiveMind. Let us know what you think! Enjoy, The Gaderian team - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpjgGEACgkQpHYnED7eviqgjwCfU12hXLQWHz/Es2AlifkEPdGA wCoAn3NvvXJPsZlYYv6DDX6rgNETLpHE =9S8G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Am Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 14.00:03 schrieb Raffael Herzog: > More suggestions: [...] Ouch, wrong list. ;) Cheers, Raffi -- The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference, but in practice, there is. herzog@raffael.ch · Jabber: herzog@raffael.ch PGP Key 0x5FFDB5DB5D1FF5F4 · http://keyserver.pgp.com
Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2009 13.56:01 schrieb Johan Lindquist: > One thing which you can help with already now - a new name is needed > for Hivemind - so if you have any suggestions, please let the us know > and we'll create a short-list for a final vote over at OPS4J! > > We'll keep you posted ... More suggestions: - Menjangan I find it a bit hard to remember, unfortunately. Menjangan is a small Island between Bali and Java, known for the nice coral reefs for diving. I think the "hard to remember" is a killer, but maybe there are some divers here, that know similar places (Java, Corals) with better names. ;) - Wintermute http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromancer I've never read the book, unfortunately. But according to a friend of mine, in the book, Wintermute is sometimes also referred to as the Hivemind. Cheers, Raffi -- The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference, but in practice, there is. herzog@raffael.ch · Jabber: herzog@raffael.ch PGP Key 0x5FFDB5DB5D1FF5F4 · http://keyserver.pgp.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Following the recent retirement of Hivemind to the Attic, we [Raffael, Jochen and myself] have decided to pick up and continue the development under the OPS4J umbrella (see http://ops4j.org/ for more information). The original code is close to being moved into the OPS4J SVN laboratory and if all things proceed as planned, we should be able to provide a first, OPS4J released version shortly. Contributions are most welcome going forward! One thing which you can help with already now - a new name is needed for Hivemind - so if you have any suggestions, please let the us know and we'll create a short-list for a final vote over at OPS4J! We'll keep you posted ... Cheers, Johan - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ8FdRpHYnED7evioRAsNrAJ9/Mm8moCjZe1dxZD9ZMvEwg20oHgCePpSN PdqtJve7L6J4v/ZddKBfbBw= =C6Ug -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This made me laugh. Last of the great hivemind users? Adam 2009/4/18 Ben Gidley <ben@gidley.co.uk> > >
It is very sad that such a great product with so advenced ideas just gone. Althrought it is good that we at least now know about it. Also, speaking about Tapestry-ioc, whats about libraries for it? There was some choise for hivemind but it looks like that we need to start everything from the ground. Maybe there are people who want to participate or to share? Because I am trying to use tapestry-ioc too and it is boring to create all the goodies from the ground. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, James Carman > <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Sure! But with a lot more vitamin then just juice ;) >> >> Fortified GuicyMind? >> > > Yep! > > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com >
I'm interested too :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johan Lindquist" <johan@kawoo.co.uk> To: <dev@hivemind.apache.org> Cc: <user@hivemind.apache.org> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 2:31 PM Subject: Re: The Attic and Beyond > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Raffael, > > I am all for this idea - not very familiar with OPS4J, but their > intentions sounds good. Definitely would allow more contributions to > trickle in. > > So, count me in. > > Cheers, > > Johan > > Raffael Herzog wrote: >> Hi all >> >> So, now it's official: HiveMind's development at Apache has stopped. Time >> to >> move on and start over. ;) >> >> For me, one thing is clear: I will branch HiveMind, one way or the other. >> The question for me is: Which way? >> >> As some of you may know, I'm developing and using HiveApp, an extension >> to >> HiveMind which adds a VFS, ClassLoader management, built-in JMX support >> and >> some useful services. There are many applications based on it in >> production >> (and there will be many more) and its development continues, although >> it's >> currently a one-man-show (everything's open though, and anyone is free to >> join: http://hiveapp.raffael.ch/). >> >> So, from this point of view, the obvious thing to do is to take >> HiveMind's >> source code, integrate it into HiveApp's source tree, and just continue >> like that. >> >> However, now's the time to look further. ;) HiveMind, as it is now, is >> good, >> but it's gotten a bit outdated, and development as officially stalled. >> I've >> got many ideas what to do with HiveMind (you can find some of them in >> HiveApp) and I'm sure, there are more people with ideas. This is the time >> to progressively move forward, because there won't be any HiveMind 1.2 or >> 2.0 anymore. But there may be a HiveSomethingElse 0.1. >> >> The question is: If you had commit rights for HiveMind's source code >> tomorrow, would you start contributing? >> >> The idea is to branch HiveMind at OPS4J (http://www.ops4j.org/). OPS4J >> stands for "Open Participation Software for Java", a relatively young and >> active FOSS community. "Open Participation" means basically Wiki brought >> to >> coding. Anyone can start contributing: Just register yourself, and you've >> immediately got commit access to all of OPS4J's SVN. At OPS4J, if you >> find >> a bug, you don't submit a patch which fixes it and wait for a committer >> to >> apply your patch. At OPS4J, you commit the fix yourself. OPS4J provides >> all >> the infrastructure one needs: Version control (SVN), bug tracking (JIRA), >> Wiki (Confluence), CI (Bamboo), mailing lists, web space ... >> >> Introduction to OPS4J: http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Introduction >> >> I think, this community might be just the right thing to kickstart >> HiveMind's development. I've already talked to some people at OPS4J about >> it, they'd happily welcome the HiveMind community. >> >> However, the question remains: Are there people who would actually >> contribute? >> >> What do you think? >> >> Cheers, >> Raffi >> > > - -- > you too? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFJ6Ha7pHYnED7evioRAiDdAJ9pgRQ+B3B1bxHDaUqI0hNDhmF3RgCePRWH > Nx3ymRS0a/AkAsvdBTPlIp8= > =cV41 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, James Carman <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: >> Sure! But with a lot more vitamin then just juice ;) > > Fortified GuicyMind? > Yep! -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure! But with a lot more vitamin then just juice ;) Fortified GuicyMind?
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:21 PM, James Carman <jcarman@carmanconsulting.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yep, Martin stand right. It has all the pleasures HiveMind has without >> the need of any XML > > It's like GuicyMind! :) Sure! But with a lot more vitamin then just juice ;) -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep, Martin stand right. It has all the pleasures HiveMind has without > the need of any XML It's like GuicyMind! :)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Martin Strand <do.not.eat.yellow.snow@gmail.com> wrote: > It doesn't require the web part of tapestry, I'm using tapestry-ioc in a desktop application myself > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:28:07 +0200, Kevin Gilpin <kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com> wrote: > >> I guess that is a standalone library that doesn't require tapestry? Yep, Martin stand right. It has all the pleasures HiveMind has without the need of any XML Regards -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
It doesn't require the web part of tapestry, I'm using tapestry-ioc in a desktop application myself On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:28:07 +0200, Kevin Gilpin <kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com> wrote: > I guess that is a standalone library that doesn't require tapestry? > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Nothing that I know of (beyond the usual suspects in the IoC world). >> > >> > That's a very good point though and something for the Attic to >> > document if any of the HiveMind community identify an obvious >> > candidate. >> >> Yep... as someone else already suggested Tapestry5 IoC is the natural >> candidate of HiveMind. >> It's the evolution of the species. >> >> Regards >> -- >> Massimo >> http://meridio.blogspot.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Raffael, I am all for this idea - not very familiar with OPS4J, but their intentions sounds good. Definitely would allow more contributions to trickle in. So, count me in. Cheers, Johan Raffael Herzog wrote: > Hi all > > So, now it's official: HiveMind's development at Apache has stopped. Time to > move on and start over. ;) > > For me, one thing is clear: I will branch HiveMind, one way or the other. > The question for me is: Which way? > > As some of you may know, I'm developing and using HiveApp, an extension to > HiveMind which adds a VFS, ClassLoader management, built-in JMX support and > some useful services. There are many applications based on it in production > (and there will be many more) and its development continues, although it's > currently a one-man-show (everything's open though, and anyone is free to > join: http://hiveapp.raffael.ch/). > > So, from this point of view, the obvious thing to do is to take HiveMind's > source code, integrate it into HiveApp's source tree, and just continue > like that. > > However, now's the time to look further. ;) HiveMind, as it is now, is good, > but it's gotten a bit outdated, and development as officially stalled. I've > got many ideas what to do with HiveMind (you can find some of them in > HiveApp) and I'm sure, there are more people with ideas. This is the time > to progressively move forward, because there won't be any HiveMind 1.2 or > 2.0 anymore. But there may be a HiveSomethingElse 0.1. > > The question is: If you had commit rights for HiveMind's source code > tomorrow, would you start contributing? > > The idea is to branch HiveMind at OPS4J (http://www.ops4j.org/). OPS4J > stands for "Open Participation Software for Java", a relatively young and > active FOSS community. "Open Participation" means basically Wiki brought to > coding. Anyone can start contributing: Just register yourself, and you've > immediately got commit access to all of OPS4J's SVN. At OPS4J, if you find > a bug, you don't submit a patch which fixes it and wait for a committer to > apply your patch. At OPS4J, you commit the fix yourself. OPS4J provides all > the infrastructure one needs: Version control (SVN), bug tracking (JIRA), > Wiki (Confluence), CI (Bamboo), mailing lists, web space ... > > Introduction to OPS4J: http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Introduction > > I think, this community might be just the right thing to kickstart > HiveMind's development. I've already talked to some people at OPS4J about > it, they'd happily welcome the HiveMind community. > > However, the question remains: Are there people who would actually > contribute? > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Raffi > - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ6Ha7pHYnED7evioRAiDdAJ9pgRQ+B3B1bxHDaUqI0hNDhmF3RgCePRWH Nx3ymRS0a/AkAsvdBTPlIp8= =cV41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi all So, now it's official: HiveMind's development at Apache has stopped. Time to move on and start over. ;) For me, one thing is clear: I will branch HiveMind, one way or the other. The question for me is: Which way? As some of you may know, I'm developing and using HiveApp, an extension to HiveMind which adds a VFS, ClassLoader management, built-in JMX support and some useful services. There are many applications based on it in production (and there will be many more) and its development continues, although it's currently a one-man-show (everything's open though, and anyone is free to join: http://hiveapp.raffael.ch/). So, from this point of view, the obvious thing to do is to take HiveMind's source code, integrate it into HiveApp's source tree, and just continue like that. However, now's the time to look further. ;) HiveMind, as it is now, is good, but it's gotten a bit outdated, and development as officially stalled. I've got many ideas what to do with HiveMind (you can find some of them in HiveApp) and I'm sure, there are more people with ideas. This is the time to progressively move forward, because there won't be any HiveMind 1.2 or 2.0 anymore. But there may be a HiveSomethingElse 0.1. The question is: If you had commit rights for HiveMind's source code tomorrow, would you start contributing? The idea is to branch HiveMind at OPS4J (http://www.ops4j.org/). OPS4J stands for "Open Participation Software for Java", a relatively young and active FOSS community. "Open Participation" means basically Wiki brought to coding. Anyone can start contributing: Just register yourself, and you've immediately got commit access to all of OPS4J's SVN. At OPS4J, if you find a bug, you don't submit a patch which fixes it and wait for a committer to apply your patch. At OPS4J, you commit the fix yourself. OPS4J provides all the infrastructure one needs: Version control (SVN), bug tracking (JIRA), Wiki (Confluence), CI (Bamboo), mailing lists, web space ... Introduction to OPS4J: http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/ops4j/Introduction I think, this community might be just the right thing to kickstart HiveMind's development. I've already talked to some people at OPS4J about it, they'd happily welcome the HiveMind community. However, the question remains: Are there people who would actually contribute? What do you think? Cheers, Raffi -- The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference, but in practice, there is. herzog@raffael.ch · Jabber: herzog@raffael.ch PGP Key 0x5FFDB5DB5D1FF5F4 · http://keyserver.pgp.com
I guess that is a standalone library that doesn't require tapestry? On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mlusetti@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Nothing that I know of (beyond the usual suspects in the IoC world). > > > > That's a very good point though and something for the Attic to > > document if any of the HiveMind community identify an obvious > > candidate. > > Yep... as someone else already suggested Tapestry5 IoC is the natural > candidate of HiveMind. > It's the evolution of the species. > > Regards > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > -- CTO Praxeon Inc kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing that I know of (beyond the usual suspects in the IoC world). > > That's a very good point though and something for the Attic to > document if any of the HiveMind community identify an obvious > candidate. Yep... as someone else already suggested Tapestry5 IoC is the natural candidate of HiveMind. It's the evolution of the species. Regards -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com
i now use Tapestry IOC instead... and i think guice would be interesting as well but not as flexible g,kris On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing that I know of (beyond the usual suspects in the IoC world). > > That's a very good point though and something for the Attic to > document if any of the HiveMind community identify an obvious > candidate. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Kevin Gilpin <kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com> wrote: >> Is there a recommendation to switch to an alternative framework? >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> A heads up for the HiveMind user community that the HiveMind project >>> has been 'moved to the Attic'. This means that the HiveMind developers >>> (more formally its Project Management Committee) have voted to retire >>> HiveMind and move the responsibility for its oversight over to the >>> Attic project. >>> >>> You can read more about the Apache Attic at http://attic.apache.org. >>> >>> HiveMind is the first project to move into the Attic, so the process >>> will be identified as we go along. You can follow this at >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-1 if you so wish. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Henri Yandell >>> on behalf of HiveMind + the Attic. >> >> >> >> -- >> CTO >> Praxeon Inc >> kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com >> >
Nothing that I know of (beyond the usual suspects in the IoC world). That's a very good point though and something for the Attic to document if any of the HiveMind community identify an obvious candidate. On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Kevin Gilpin <kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com> wrote: > Is there a recommendation to switch to an alternative framework? > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A heads up for the HiveMind user community that the HiveMind project >> has been 'moved to the Attic'. This means that the HiveMind developers >> (more formally its Project Management Committee) have voted to retire >> HiveMind and move the responsibility for its oversight over to the >> Attic project. >> >> You can read more about the Apache Attic at http://attic.apache.org. >> >> HiveMind is the first project to move into the Attic, so the process >> will be identified as we go along. You can follow this at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-1 if you so wish. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Henri Yandell >> on behalf of HiveMind + the Attic. > > > > -- > CTO > Praxeon Inc > kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com >
Is there a recommendation to switch to an alternative framework? On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote: > A heads up for the HiveMind user community that the HiveMind project > has been 'moved to the Attic'. This means that the HiveMind developers > (more formally its Project Management Committee) have voted to retire > HiveMind and move the responsibility for its oversight over to the > Attic project. > > You can read more about the Apache Attic at http://attic.apache.org. > > HiveMind is the first project to move into the Attic, so the process > will be identified as we go along. You can follow this at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-1 if you so wish. > > Thanks, > > Henri Yandell > on behalf of HiveMind + the Attic. > -- CTO Praxeon Inc kevin.gilpin@praxeon.com
A heads up for the HiveMind user community that the HiveMind project has been 'moved to the Attic'. This means that the HiveMind developers (more formally its Project Management Committee) have voted to retire HiveMind and move the responsibility for its oversight over to the Attic project. You can read more about the Apache Attic at http://attic.apache.org. HiveMind is the first project to move into the Attic, so the process will be identified as we go along. You can follow this at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-1 if you so wish. Thanks, Henri Yandell on behalf of HiveMind + the Attic.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Joacim,
The values will not be logged unless you enable debugging
for the com.mycompany.services.MyService category (as you have seen I
assume from your comment about production vs debug).
An interceptor won't help either in this case since the set operation
happens on the core implementation.
For what it is worth, we tend to add this sort of output in the
intializeService method - where we also do some sanity check about
services being available etc.
Cheers,
Johan
Joacim Turesson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have recently started to work with HiveMind.
>
> Is it possible to log the parameter values used when construct is called
> for invoke-factory?
> May I use an interceptor? If so how?
> Or do I have to implement my own BuildFactory?
>
> I'm not sure if I make any sense, below is an example:
>
> <service-point id="MyService" interface="com.mycompany.services.MyService">
> <invoke-factory service-id="hivemind.BuilderFactory" model="singleton">
> <construct class="com.mycompany.services.MyServiceImpl">
> <string>
> ${service/myservice/param}
> </string>
> </construct>
> </invoke-factory>
> </service-point>
>
> I want to log the value of ${service/myservice/param} and I want to log
> it in production, not just when debugging.
>
> Tanks in advance!
>
> Best regards
>
> Joacim Turesson
>
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJcKF1pHYnED7evioRApcWAJ0bZ0j62uIhCW/8ilOmPMhDtSyiiACfXGzb
85LnAXY5NFTjytXW8QsGxSA=
=XpTI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi!
I have recently started to work with HiveMind.
Is it possible to log the parameter values used when construct is called for
invoke-factory?
May I use an interceptor? If so how?
Or do I have to implement my own BuildFactory?
I'm not sure if I make any sense, below is an example:
<service-point id="MyService" interface="com.mycompany.services.MyService">
<invoke-factory service-id="hivemind.BuilderFactory" model="singleton">
<construct class="com.mycompany.services.MyServiceImpl">
<string>
${service/myservice/param}
</string>
</construct>
</invoke-factory>
</service-point>
I want to log the value of ${service/myservice/param} and I want to log it
in production, not just when debugging.
Tanks in advance!
Best regards
Joacim Turesson
Can't make ApacheCon this week in New Orleans? You can still watch all
the keynotes, Apache 101 sessions, and system administration track in
live video streams:
http://streaming.linux-magazin.de/en/program_apacheconus08.htm?ann
Keynotes and the Apache 101 lunchtime sessions are free; the full
sysadmin track, including httpd performance, security, and server stack
administration talks are available for a fee.
Keynotes include:
- David Recordon, Six Apart (Wednesday 09:30)
"Learning from Apache to create Open Specifications"
- Shahani Markus Weerawarana, Ph.D. (Thursday 11:30)
"Standing on the Shoulders of Giants"
- Sam Ramji, Microsoft (Friday 11:30)
"struct.new("future", :open, :microsoft)"
Reminder: New Orleans is CST or UTC/GMT -6 hours.
Advance notice: ApacheCon EU 2009 returns to Amsterdam, 23-27 March. We
had a great response to our CFP and look forward to announcing the
schedule in the next month.
-------------------------------------------
--
Lars Eilebrecht - V.P., Conference Planning
lars@apache.org - http://www.us.apachecon.com
unsubscribe On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 8:07 AM, alina2 <aquereilhac@yahoo.es> wrote: > > Hello, > i am new to hivemind and i wanted to integrate > http://dozer.sourceforge.net/ Dozer (a "Java Bean to Java Bean mapper") > to > the application i am working at. > I spent some time trying to figure out how to do this, so i post the > solution i found in case it turns out to be useful for someone else too (or > so it can be improved by others). > > <service-point id="mapperService" > interface="net.sf.dozer.util.mapping.MapperIF" /> > > <configuration-point id="mappingFiles"> > <schema> > <element name="mappingFile"> > <attribute name="value" required="true"/> > <rules> > <push-attribute attribute="value"/> > <invoke-parent method="addElement"/> > </rules> > </element> > </schema> > </configuration-point> > > <contribution configuration-id="mappingFiles"> > <mappingFile value="dozerBeanMapping.xml" /> > </contribution> > > <implementation service-id="mapperService"> > <invoke-factory> > <construct class="net.sf.dozer.util.mapping.DozerBeanMapper"> > <set-configuration property="mappingFiles" > configuration-id="mappingFiles"/> > </construct> > </invoke-factory> > </implementation> > > Cheers, > alina. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Dozer-and-Hivemind-Integration---injecting-a-list-of-string-tp19796513p19796513.html > Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Ed Ross edross15057@gmail.com
Hello,
i am new to hivemind and i wanted to integrate
http://dozer.sourceforge.net/ Dozer (a "Java Bean to Java Bean mapper") to
the application i am working at.
I spent some time trying to figure out how to do this, so i post the
solution i found in case it turns out to be useful for someone else too (or
so it can be improved by others).
<service-point id="mapperService"
interface="net.sf.dozer.util.mapping.MapperIF" />
<configuration-point id="mappingFiles">
<schema>
<element name="mappingFile">
<attribute name="value" required="true"/>
<rules>
<push-attribute attribute="value"/>
<invoke-parent method="addElement"/>
</rules>
</element>
</schema>
</configuration-point>
<contribution configuration-id="mappingFiles">
<mappingFile value="dozerBeanMapping.xml" />
</contribution>
<implementation service-id="mapperService">
<invoke-factory>
<construct class="net.sf.dozer.util.mapping.DozerBeanMapper">
<set-configuration property="mappingFiles"
configuration-id="mappingFiles"/>
</construct>
</invoke-factory>
</implementation>
Cheers,
alina.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dozer-and-Hivemind-Integration---injecting-a-list-of-string-tp19796513p19796513.html
Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I changed the PropertyFileSymbolSource now the class search the file inside
the war file.
Everything ok ;)
thanks Johan.
Johan Lindquist wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ok, that won't help then - should have read it a little closer ;)
>
> Then I think you are limited in your options:
>
> - - Build on the hiveutils symbol source and write your own symbol source
> - - Convert you property file into a hivemodule, contributing to
> hivemind.ApplicationDefaults from within that.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
> imorales wrote:
>> Thansk for the response, that helps but not at all.
>>
>> Reading the "Externalizing properties outside the war file" when you
>> specify
>> the
>> "<property-source file="c:/mysettings.properties"/>" this is a file
>> outside
>> the war file and you have to difine the absolute path to the property
>> file,
>> but in my case I need to define a relative path because the property file
>> is
>> inside the war file. Any ideas ?
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Johan Lindquist wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The hiveutils project [1] has an option to provide properties files as a
>> source of values for the substitution (which is what you are looking for
>> I think).
>>
>> The property file would be registered as a symbol source within
>> Hivemind, and hivemind would use the values from it when creating your
>> service.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Johan
>>
>> [1]
>> http://hivetranse.sourceforge.net/web/quickstart.html#start.external.symbols
>>
>> imorales wrote:
>>>>> Hi all. I´m using Hivemind1. Is it possible configure hivemodule.xml
>>>>> with
>>>>> a
>>>>> property file?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to have a hivemodule.properties like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>> urlService=http://myservice.com
>>>>> urlService2=http://myservice2.com
>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> And in the hivemodule xml do this:
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>> <service-point id="....." interface=".......">
>>>>> <invoke-factory model="threaded">
>>>>> <construct class="my.package.myService">
>>>>> <string>${urlService}</string>
>>>>> </construct>
>>>>> </invoke-factory>
>>>>> </service-point>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>> I would like to do something like that, it is posible in with hivemind
>>>>> do
>>>>> that ???
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>
> - --
> you too?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIR7rypHYnED7evioRAsAPAJ9cLp+wC/wUZ9UnGSGgk5exhlpfSQCgrFjP
> QL6G5cRr5SZmBTeyashbo6U=
> =Oi4R
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hivemind-.properties-file-----tp17665637p17670533.html
Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ok, that won't help then - should have read it a little closer ;)
Then I think you are limited in your options:
- - Build on the hiveutils symbol source and write your own symbol source
- - Convert you property file into a hivemodule, contributing to
hivemind.ApplicationDefaults from within that.
Cheers,
Johan
imorales wrote:
> Thansk for the response, that helps but not at all.
>
> Reading the "Externalizing properties outside the war file" when you specify
> the
> "<property-source file="c:/mysettings.properties"/>" this is a file outside
> the war file and you have to difine the absolute path to the property file,
> but in my case I need to define a relative path because the property file is
> inside the war file. Any ideas ?
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Johan Lindquist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The hiveutils project [1] has an option to provide properties files as a
> source of values for the substitution (which is what you are looking for
> I think).
>
> The property file would be registered as a symbol source within
> Hivemind, and hivemind would use the values from it when creating your
> service.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
> [1]
> http://hivetranse.sourceforge.net/web/quickstart.html#start.external.symbols
>
> imorales wrote:
>>>> Hi all. I´m using Hivemind1. Is it possible configure hivemodule.xml with
>>>> a
>>>> property file?
>>>>
>>>> I would like to have a hivemodule.properties like this:
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------
>>>> urlService=http://myservice.com
>>>> urlService2=http://myservice2.com
>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> And in the hivemodule xml do this:
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>> <service-point id="....." interface=".......">
>>>> <invoke-factory model="threaded">
>>>> <construct class="my.package.myService">
>>>> <string>${urlService}</string>
>>>> </construct>
>>>> </invoke-factory>
>>>> </service-point>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>> I would like to do something like that, it is posible in with hivemind do
>>>> that ???
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIR7rypHYnED7evioRAsAPAJ9cLp+wC/wUZ9UnGSGgk5exhlpfSQCgrFjP
QL6G5cRr5SZmBTeyashbo6U=
=Oi4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Thansk for the response, that helps but not at all.
Reading the "Externalizing properties outside the war file" when you specify
the
"<property-source file="c:/mysettings.properties"/>" this is a file outside
the war file and you have to difine the absolute path to the property file,
but in my case I need to define a relative path because the property file is
inside the war file. Any ideas ?
Thanks again.
Johan Lindquist wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> The hiveutils project [1] has an option to provide properties files as a
> source of values for the substitution (which is what you are looking for
> I think).
>
> The property file would be registered as a symbol source within
> Hivemind, and hivemind would use the values from it when creating your
> service.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Johan
>
> [1]
> http://hivetranse.sourceforge.net/web/quickstart.html#start.external.symbols
>
> imorales wrote:
>> Hi all. I´m using Hivemind1. Is it possible configure hivemodule.xml with
>> a
>> property file?
>>
>> I would like to have a hivemodule.properties like this:
>>
>> --------------------------------
>> urlService=http://myservice.com
>> urlService2=http://myservice2.com
>> --------------------------------
>>
>> And in the hivemodule xml do this:
>> ------------------------------------
>> <service-point id="....." interface=".......">
>> <invoke-factory model="threaded">
>> <construct class="my.package.myService">
>> <string>${urlService}</string>
>> </construct>
>> </invoke-factory>
>> </service-point>
>> ------------------------------------
>> I would like to do something like that, it is posible in with hivemind do
>> that ???
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>
> - --
> you too?
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIR7RtpHYnED7evioRAnXyAJ48J+GhM5m/BpkdzrBS0m0vpBGQnQCeJled
> WFzOPiEUK5g/+aaEYGkQdo8=
> =zv9O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hivemind-.properties-file-----tp17665637p17666193.html
Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The hiveutils project [1] has an option to provide properties files as a
source of values for the substitution (which is what you are looking for
I think).
The property file would be registered as a symbol source within
Hivemind, and hivemind would use the values from it when creating your
service.
Hope that helps,
Cheers,
Johan
[1]
http://hivetranse.sourceforge.net/web/quickstart.html#start.external.symbols
imorales wrote:
> Hi all. I´m using Hivemind1. Is it possible configure hivemodule.xml with a
> property file?
>
> I would like to have a hivemodule.properties like this:
>
> --------------------------------
> urlService=http://myservice.com
> urlService2=http://myservice2.com
> --------------------------------
>
> And in the hivemodule xml do this:
> ------------------------------------
> <service-point id="....." interface=".......">
> <invoke-factory model="threaded">
> <construct class="my.package.myService">
> <string>${urlService}</string>
> </construct>
> </invoke-factory>
> </service-point>
> ------------------------------------
> I would like to do something like that, it is posible in with hivemind do
> that ???
>
> Thanks in advance.
- --
you too?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIR7RtpHYnED7evioRAnXyAJ48J+GhM5m/BpkdzrBS0m0vpBGQnQCeJled
WFzOPiEUK5g/+aaEYGkQdo8=
=zv9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi all. I´m using Hivemind1. Is it possible configure hivemodule.xml with a
property file?
I would like to have a hivemodule.properties like this:
--------------------------------
urlService=http://myservice.com
urlService2=http://myservice2.com
--------------------------------
And in the hivemodule xml do this:
------------------------------------
<service-point id="....." interface=".......">
<invoke-factory model="threaded">
<construct class="my.package.myService">
<string>${urlService}</string>
</construct>
</invoke-factory>
</service-point>
------------------------------------
I would like to do something like that, it is posible in with hivemind do
that ???
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hivemind-.properties-file-----tp17665637p17665637.html
Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Use mapped configuration,
cntribute all workers to it, named with a string,
use that mapped configuration to get the needed worker...
check the tapestry site for more info on Mapped configuration
...
Davor Hrg
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:49 PM, <flidp@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I want to do something like this (simplified)
>
> public class someService {
>
> private Registry _registry;
>
> public void doSomething(String sPoint, Object obj) {
>
> SomeInterface worker = _registry.getService(sPoint, someInterface.class);
> worker.doTheWork(obj);
>
> }
>
> ... getter/setter ....
>
> }
>
> someService is a service constructed by the registry and has a property
> holding the registry again ... is this possible?
> Or is there another way to do something like this?
>
> Thanks for any suggestions!
>
>
Hello everyone!
I want to do something like this (simplified)
public class someService {
private Registry _registry;
public void doSomething(String sPoint, Object obj) {
SomeInterface worker = _registry.getService(sPoint, someInterface.class);
worker.doTheWork(obj);
}
... getter/setter ....
}
someService is a service constructed by the registry and has a property holding the registry
again ... is this possible?
Or is there another way to do something like this?
Thanks for any suggestions!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, To prevent this behaviour, register a "strict" error handler, which will propagate the errors to the application layer. The code looks something like below: // Create a new registry builder, specifying the strict error handler RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder(new StrictErrorHandler()); // Add the default module provider builder.addDefaultModuleDescriptorProvider(); // Boot the registry Registry registry = builder.constructRegistry(Locale.getDefault()); I hope that helps, Cheers, Johan hamtho wrote: | Hi, | | currently my hivemind simple ignores any erroneous hivemind-contributions, | which might lead to some errors later on. Is there any chance to stop | hivemind from deploying/further processing if there is any error instead of | ignoring this contribution? | | Any help is greatly appriciated | | Thomas - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIDFwcpHYnED7evioRApbbAJ9o5EySNZKaI9O/Ogz+pMJq3tFIKgCdHrNn lTGXCQMZ3y88r1Tm37lFmOQ= =1BRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi, currently my hivemind simple ignores any erroneous hivemind-contributions, which might lead to some errors later on. Is there any chance to stop hivemind from deploying/further processing if there is any error instead of ignoring this contribution? Any help is greatly appriciated Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stop-hivemind-on-errors-warnings-tp16804684p16804684.html Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, currently my hivemind simple ignores any erroneous hivemind-contributions, which might lead to some errors later on. Is there any chance to stop hivemind from deploying/further processing if there is any error instead of ignoring this contribution? Any help is greatly appriciated Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Stop-hivemind-on-errors-warnings-tp16804681p16804681.html Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Looks interesting - would be very useful when you want to expose a more extended API to internal components (could mark the extended service as visibility="private") while only exposing a sub-set of the API to external components. You should consider submitting it as an enhancement :) Cheers, Johan sardine wrote: | If you want to share the same implementation or instance between different | service interfaces, please consult | http://imsardine.blogspot.com/2008/03/hivemind-how-to-share-same.html here . | - -- you too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH6NMCpHYnED7evioRAkRwAKConjuQvThtIX3bDpXbyq08JM0qtACeKKZY M7ciY44mA5hTPGqAU79ACck= =ZLL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If you want to share the same implementation or instance between different service interfaces, please consult http://imsardine.blogspot.com/2008/03/hivemind-how-to-share-same.html here . -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-share-the-same-implementation-or-instance-between-different-service-interfaces-tp16212389p16212389.html Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thank you, Johan; that's very helpful. I appreciate it. ---mr. bean Johan Lindquist wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Hivemind does provide the plugability to you are looking for in the > sense that you could have each plug-in defined as a service and each > plug-in providing it's own information (for simplicity, the name and > service id ) to a central configuration (a configuration point) that can > be accessed at runtime by a plug-in lookup manager. To load a > particular plug-in, it could use the plug-in name to lookup the > associated plug-in service id (from the configuration point). > > I guess what this brings to you is a dynamic way of registering new > plugins, simply dropping in a new plug-in jar would automagically > register it in the system. The command line switches could then, in > theory, be reduced to the user selecting the name of which plug-in to use. > > Hope that helps somewhat. > > Cheers, > > Johan > > mister bean wrote: > | I am deep into a project that reads in a data file, massages it, and > writes > | out reports in various formats(spreadsheets, SVG chart, PDF, etc.). It > | currently uses plug-ins for the data massaging and for the various > output > | formats. These plug-ins are JAR files that are loaded via a standard > class > | loader. > | > | Which plug-in to use when is determined by command-line switches. The > code > | examines them and then loads, let's say, the PDF plugin. Because this > is all > | done in code, it casts the plug-in location process into stone. I am > about > | to externalize this step, by using an XML config file. (PDF output? > Look up > | in the config file which plug-in JAR to use). This way, I can add new > | plugins and capabilities without having to change the code. > | > | Before I make this change, I am beginning to wonder whether HiveMind > would > | make better sense here. If so, what would it bring me that I don't get > by > | using a simple XML config file? My sense is that HiveMind is probably > | overkill for what I need. But I would appreciate some thoughts from > users > | before I commit to lots of time on the learning curve (rewarding as that > | might be ;-) to solve this specific problem. > | > | Many thanks in advance. > | > | ---mr. bean > | > | > > > - -- > you too? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHsuC/pHYnED7evioRAiwYAKCNf8w+Kzcy1kXhjmqEAWdowvUHOwCffshX > knEuo/Ryn5A+xJTKLsPJbYo= > =JW3T > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Newbie-question%3A-Is-Hivemind-well-suited-for-this-task--tp15450983p15469781.html Sent from the Hivemind - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.